More and more scientists oppose the global warming scam

“Warming fears are the worst scientific scandal in the history. When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.”

“It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.”

“For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?”

“Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting warming fears), without having their professional careers ruined.”

“The [global warming] scaremongering has its justification in the fact that it is something that generates funds.”

These are quotes from among 650 leading scientists who spoke out against the UN-sponsored and Al Gore-promoted global warming conspiracy. The scheme is to justify the misdirection of tax dollars to fund their scare-mongering, their pseudo-scientific studies, their media hype, and their increasing control over industry and commerce. This new socialism is worse than the old one, and more insidious. Rather than elevate the needs of some over the rights of others, it raises plant life to a higher priority than human life.

The early green radicals sought to instill in us the notion that we, all humans, were a blight upon the planet and needed to be culled. There”s was a philosophical attack, not a political one, and its target was the same as socialism”s – the individual, his rights and freedoms. As socialism died, those whose philosophical mindset was unalterably opposed to individualism grasped the straw that environmentalism held out. More importantly, so did those far more numerous and less philosophically informed, content to ride as so much flotsam on trendy cultural tides.

At fault are the liberals (in name) and conservatives who accept the basic premise of socialism – that the individual is either too stupid (the liberal perspective) or too evil (the conservative perspective) and therefore must be controlled – but that socialism carries it too far. And just as Bismark saved Germany from communism by accepting the collectivist”s premise and paving the way for Nazism, liberals and conservatives are rolling out the red (or green) carpet for enviro-fascism.

One would hope that once enough scientific authority condemns this global warming fraud it can be consigned to history”s dust-bin. However, given the penchant for human-hating collectivists to accept any and every irrational alternative to individual liberty, who knows how bad it”s successor will be.

In the mean time, don”t waste an extra penny to “combat” global warming more than you are forced to.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *